Week 3 Articulation

1) My argument

I want to argue that The lie detector is not accurate to use in the court as the evidence. According to the common notion, lie detector can distinguish the lie and the true. But as I research, it is not accurate. 

2) How I found my argument

Through research, I can know that there are two kinds of lie detector. And I also understand the two device's difference. And I find that lie detector is not accurate as the common notion. And I start to find some limit of the lie detector. In my research, there are 3 serious limits of lie detector. So my first argument is just 'Lie detector is not accurate'. But through this research , I give shape to my argument. And now, my argument is the  The lie detector is not accurate to use in the court as the evidence.

3) New research questions

I have several questions that need to be resolved.

• There are some people that lie detector is accurate and helpful in the court. So what is their reasons?
• Is there any real examples who have affected lie detector's incomplete in the court or life?
• Is there any information that can support my arguments except the information I already found?
• Why false memory created?

4) Connections to the Harvard Sampler 

I think my argument has a connection to the Harvard Sampler in 'medical detective'. In our life, lie detector is used as the device to detect lie in the investigation. So I think lie detector can be a topic about medial detectives.