Week 9 first draft refutation and concession
1. What is my thesis?
The lie detector is not accurate to use in the court as the evidence
The lie detector is not accurate to use in the court as the evidence
2. What is the opposite position?
Eventually, the lie detector is accurate and can be used as the evidence in the court.
3. What arguments can I anticipate?
a) The lie detector is accurate because it distinguish lie through physiological phenomena that recorded in figure.
b) There is no reason to reject to do lie detector test, if the person is guiltless and innocent.
c) The lie detector is a useful device in the court because it just can be used for reference to judgement.
4. How will I counter those arguments?
4. How will I counter those arguments?
a) In the research that I found, there are information that tells the lie detector's record is just relative. So, even the record is in the figure or in the statistics, it is not accurate.
b) There can be many reason to reject. For example, the person can be too nervous to have the examination or the person is just worry about the misjudged of the lie detector although guiltless.
c) If the lie detector used just for reference, it can play the important role in the judgement. It will make the judge and member of the jury to think biased.
My Refutation and Concession
Some people can be argue that The lie detector is accurate because it distinguish lie through physiological phenomena that recorded in figure. They think the figure is more accurate than the person's guessing. And they can argue if the person is guiltless and innocent, there is no reason to reject to do lie detector test. Also they may think the lie detector is a useful device in the court because it just can be used for reference to judgement. However these arguments are not logical.
First, in the research that I found above, there are information that tell the lie detector's record is just relative. So, even the record is in the figure or in the statistics, it is not accurate.
Second, opposing to their arguments, I think there are many reason to reject. For example, the person can be too nervous to have the examination or the person is just worry about the misjudged of the lie detector although guiltless. The lie detector make the person nervous.
Lastly, if the lie detector used just for reference, it can be help to judge. However, also, it can be make to think biased. The evidence can also play the important role in the judgement. It will make the judge and member of the jury to think biased. Moreover it can be used as the tool to get desired result.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기